Appeal from Baxter Circuit Court; Robert W. McCorkindale, Judge; affirmed.
1. SCHOOLS & SCHOOL DISTRICTS - USE OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENT. - Under the School Discipline Act, any teacher or school principal may use corporal punishment in a reasonable manner against any pupil for good cause in order to maintain discipline and order within the public schools.
2. SCHOOLS & SCHOOL DISTRICTS - ABUSE DEFINED. - Abuse is defined as any nonaccidental physical injury inflicted on a child by anyone legally responsible for the care and maintenance of the child, or an injury that is at variance with the history given.
3. APPEAL & ERROR - REVIEW OF CASE TO REMOVE NAME ENTERED IN STATE CENTRAL REGISTRY. - On appeal, the appellate court reviews the entire record to determine if there is some credible evidence of alleged abuse to support the maintenance of the alleged abuser's name in the State Central Registry.
4. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & PROCEDURE - FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN SUBSTANTIATING CHILD ABUSE. - One factor, standing alone and applied as a litmus test, without consideration of all the attendant circumstances, is not an appropriate measure to be used in all cases for determining whether an allegation of abuse is to be substantiated in all cases; there must be some exercise of judgment, as this is an area that does not lend itself to facile determination.
5. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & PROCEDURE - NO CREDIBLE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT MAINTENANCE OF ALLEGED CHILD ABUSER'S NAME IN STATE CENTRAL REGISTRY. - In light of all the testimony and photographs, and where the caseworker testified that she did not feel that the paddling was abusive, and that substantiation was based solely on the evidence of bruising, the circuit court's finding of no credible evidence to support the allegation of abuse, and its finding that the punishment was not excessive or abusive was affirmed.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judith Rogers, Judge.
The Department of Human Services appeals from the decision of the Baxter County Circuit Court reversing the agency's finding of some credible evidence of abuse, as allegedly perpetrated by appellee, Pat Caldwell, and thereby directing the removal of appellee's name from the State Central Registry. In addition to finding no credible evidence of abuse, the court also found that appellant's policies gave rise to an irrebuttable presumption of abuse, and held that the appellant's application of its policies under the facts of this case was arbitrary and capricious, and denied appellee due process of law. On appeal, appellant advances three issues, arguing that: (1) the trial court erred in holding that the hearing officer's findings were not supported by some credible evidence; (2) the trial court erred in ruling that its policies created an irrebuttable presumption of abuse; and (3) the trial court exceeded its authority under the Administrative Procedures Act. *fn1 We affirm.
On Thursday, September 22, 1988, appellee, who is an assistant principal at the Guy Berry Middle School in Mountain Home, paddled three fifth grade students who had been caught smoking on the playground. It was a violation of school rules not only to smoke, but also to possess and strike matches on the school premises. In the presence of another teacher as a witness, the child in question received three licks with a wooden paddle, as did another one of the girls, while the third child only received one lick, as she did not actually smoke the cigarette. The girls were also instructed to write a report on smoking. The following afternoon, the child's mother noticed bruises on her daughter's buttocks. Feeling that the bruises had resulted from the spanking, the mother contacted school officials and then reported the paddling to the Baxter County Division of Children and Family Services as an incident of suspected child abuse. The assigned caseworker met with the child and her mother the next morning and took pictures of the child's buttocks. Upon completing the investigation, which included interviews with appellee and school [39 ArkApp Page 16]
personnel, and after consulting with her area manager, the caseworker "substantiated" the allegation of child abuse and forwarded a written report of the investigation for recordation in the State Central Registry, as is required pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. 12-12-508 (1987). Appellee then requested administrative review of this determination, seeking to expunge her name from the registry. A hearing was held on May 31, 1989, after which the hearing officer issued an order in which she found "some credible evidence" to substantiate the occurrence of abuse. Appellee appealed to the circuit court, which reversed the agency's decision and directed that appellee's name be stricken from the registry. This appeal followed.
As its first issue, appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that the hearing officer's findings were not supported by some credible evidence. We disagree.
[1-3] Under the School Discipline Act, it is stated that any teacher or school principal may use corporal punishment in a reasonable manner against any pupil for good cause in order to maintain discipline and order within the public schools. Ark. Code Ann. 6-18-505 (c) (1987). For our purposes here, "abuse" is defined as any nonaccidental physical injury . . . inflicted on a child by anyone legally responsible for the care and maintenance of the child, or an injury which is a variance with the history given. See Ark. Code Ann. 12-12-502 (2) (1987). *fn2 The question upon review in the circuit court is whether there is some credible evidence of alleged abuse to support the maintenance of the alleged abuser's name in the State Central Registry. See Crawford/Sebastian County SCAN v. Kelly, 300 Ark. 206, 778 S.W.2d 219 (1989). Our review is similarly limited and, on appeal, we review the entire record in making this determination. Ark. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd. v. Muncrief, 308 Ark. 373, 826 S.W.2d 816 (1992).
At the administrative hearing, appellee testified that she was in charge of the school that day because the principal was absent. [39 ArkApp Page 17]
She said that she learned of the infraction from another teacher, and that, before deciding to paddle the children, she called another administrator for advice as to the appropriate punishment, stating that it was a difficult decision since this was the first incident of smoking she had confronted involving children in that age group. Appellee questioned the girls both separately and together. She explained that, because she had taken the child to the hospital the previous year when she had broken her arm on the playground, she shared a special relationship with the child such that the conversation with her dealt more with disappointment than with anger over what she had done. Appellee testified that she followed the normal routine in administering the paddling, which included obtaining another teacher as a witness. The children were first made to tell the witness what they had done wrong, and when paddled, each were told to bend over and touch their knees, so that the buttocks would be easily hit, and to look forward, rather than at her, to hopefully prevent them from moving. She said that the child remained still while she was being paddled, and that she gave her three "average" swats. She denied ...