Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Martin v. Knight

August 18, 2006

ROSIE MARTIN PLAINTIFF
v.
CHARLES DANNY KNIGHT, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS OF THE WATSON CHAPEL, ARKANSAS SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 24, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE; AND WATSON CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 24 BOARD OF EDUCATION, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE DEFENDANTS



The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Leon Holmes United States District Judge

AMENDED AND SUBSTITUTED JUDGMENT AND DECREE

This case came before the Court for a trial by jury beginning on June 26, 2006. Rosie Martin appeared in person and through her attorney, John W. Walker. Charles Danny Knight appeared in person and through his attorney, Michael J. Dennis. The Board of Education of the Watson Chapel, Arkansas School District No. 24 appeared through its corporate representative, Maxine Nelson, and its attorney, Michael J. Dennis. All parties announced ready for trial. A jury of twelve was duly selected and sworn.

On June 30, 2006, the jury returned verdicts as follows:

1. Do you find from the greater weight of the evidence that plaintiff's race or sex was a motivating factor in defendants' decision not to promote her to the position of principal in 2002?

Yes /s/ Wendy R. Tassin ("Yes" or "No") FOREPERSON

DATED: 6-30-06

NOTE: If you answer this question "no," proceed to Question 3. If you answer this question "yes," you must answer Question 2.

2. Do you find from the greater weight of the evidence that the defendants would not have promoted plaintiff in 2002 regardless of her race or sex?

No /s/ Wendy R. Tassin ("Yes" or "No") FOREPERSON

DATED: 6-30-06

NOTE: If you answer this question "no," you must complete Question 7.

3. Do you find from the greater weight of the evidence that plaintiff's race or sex was a motivating factor in defendants' decision not to promote her to the position of principal in 2003?

No /s/ Wendy R. Tassin ("Yes" or "No") ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.