Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Steinbuch v. Cutler

September 21, 2006

ROBERT STEINBUCH PLAINTIFF
v.
JESSICA CUTLER DEFENDANT



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Wm. R.Wilson, Jr. United States District Judge

AMENDED ORDER

Plaintiff's Motion to Quash (Doc. No. 1) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART; On reflection, it appears that the following language in the subpoena duces tecum is too broad:

Each and every email, in electronic form, sent to or from (including cc's and/or bcc's) any email account assigned by you to Robert E. Steinbuch, including but not limited to the email address resteincuh@ualr.edu As an example, this could include communications between Plaintiff and his lawyer -- Plaintiff's reply lists other examples. So the request set forth in the above quoted language is denied without prejudice to allow Defendant to draw a narrower request.

Otherwise the Motion to Quash is denied; however, UALR is permitted to redact the names of student evaluators if it wishes to do so.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20060921

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.