Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Simpson v. Busby

October 31, 2006

JIMMIE SIMPSON, ADC #092157 PLAINTIFF
v.
DICK BUSBY, SHERIFF OF CRITTENDEN COUNTY, ET AL. DEFENDANTS



ORDER

On October 19, 2005, the Court appointed an attorney to represent Plaintiff in this § 1983 action. See docket entry #46. Approximately a year later, on October 26, 2006, Plaintiff filed a pro se Motion for Discovery, in which he asks the Court to ascertain the whereabouts of a potential witness. See docket entry #72. As explained to Plaintiff in the October 19, 2005 Order, he cannot file pro se pleadings now that he is represented by counsel. Instead, all pleadings and motions must be filed and signed by his appointed counsel. See docket entry #46 (citing Local Rule 5.5(c)(2)). Accordingly, the Court will deny Plaintiff's Motion. Plaintiff should discuss his discovery concerns with his appointed counsel.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery (docket entry #72) is DENIED.

20061031

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.