Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Duncan v. Clerical Staff of the Sherwood District Court

December 12, 2006

CHARLES C. DUNCAN PLAINTIFF
v.
THE CLERICAL STAFF OF THE SHERWOOD DISTRICT COURT DEFENDANT



The opinion of the court was delivered by: James M. Moody United States District Judge

ORDER

On November 9, 2006, the Court granted plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and directed plaintiff to provide the Court within 10 days of the date of the Order with the name and address of the defendant and a description of how defendant's actions deprived plaintiff of a property interest.

Plaintiff was also notified that Rule 5.5(c)(2) of the Rules of the United States District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas requires pro se litigants (1) to promptly notify the Court and the other parties in the case of any change of address; (2) to monitor the progress of the case; (3) to prosecute or defend the action diligently; and (4) to respond to any communication from the Court within thirty (30) days or risk dismissal of his case.

On November 27, 2006 the Court's November 9, 2006 Order was returned as "Mail Undeliverable." Because plaintiff has failed to notify the Court of his change of address and because plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court within thirty days of the November 9, 2006 Order, his complaint is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12 day of December, 2006.

20061212

© 1992-2006 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.