Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Richardson v. Morgan Keegan & Co.

February 13, 2007

JOANN RICHARDSON, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND THROUGH ROBERT E. RICHARDSON, JR., HER LAWFUL ATTORNEY IN FACT PLAINTIFF,
v.
MORGAN KEEGAN & COMPANY, INC.; AND VAN KAMPEN INVESTMENTS, INC. DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Honorable George Howard District Judge

ORDER

The Defendant Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. ("Morgan Keegan") filed a Motion For Summary Judgment on February 8, 2007. The Court has been advised by counsel that Defendant Morgan Keegan has agreed to extend the date by which the Plaintiff may respond to the motion through and including February 26, 2007.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have through and including February 26, 2007 to file their Response to Defendant 's Motion For Summary Judgment .

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Respectfully submitted,

EICHENBAUM, LILES & HEISTER, P.A. 124 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1400 Little Rock, AR 72201-3736 (501) 376-4531 Fax: 376 - 8433

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, James H. Penick, III, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on the following persons via regular mail by depositing same in the United States Post Office, postage prepaid on this _____ day of November, 2006.

Amy Lee Stewart Kathryn Perkins ROSE LAW FIRM 120 E. Fourth St. Little Rock, AR 72201 James H. Penick, III

20070213

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.