Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Pitchford v. Potter
February 27, 2007
FREDERICK L. PITCHFORD PLAINTIFF
v.
JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER GENERAL, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE DEFENDANT
The opinion of the court was delivered by: James M. Moody United States District Judge
Pending are the Defendant's motion for summary judgment (docket # 87), Plaintiff's pro se motion to dismiss his appointed counsel and for appointment of counsel (docket # 101) and Defendant's motion to compel, (docket # 104). This matter is currently set for trial the week of March 19, 2007.
The Court finds based upon the pleadings filed that Plaintiff's appointed counsel has adequately represented the interests of Plaintiff herein. Plaintiff's request to dismiss his appointed counsel and for appointment of counsel are denied. (Docket # 101).
The Court will remove this case from the trial docket the week of March 19, 2007 in order to consider the pending motion for summary judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of February, 2007.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...