Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association v. Van Horn

May 3, 2007

BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD ASSOCIATION PLAINTIFF
v.
JOHNNY F. VAN HORN DEFENDANT



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Garnett Thomas Eisele United States District Judge

ORDER

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to File Documents Under Seal. On May 1, 2007, the Court stated that if Plaintiff could sufficiently redact the documents it sought to file under seal, it should do so. However, the Court stated that if redacting the documents was not feasible or will not allow consideration of essential relevant provisions of the document, the Court would allow Plaintiff to file the documents under seal for an in camera inspection by the Court. The Court directed Plaintiff to inform the Court of its intended course of action, and held the motion in abeyance.

On May 2, 2007, Plaintiff filed its Response to the Motion to Dismiss with a redacted document as an exhibit. Plaintiff has informed the Court that it does not intend to further pursue its Motion to File Documents Under Seal, unless the Court needs to see the remainder of the contract for deciding this motion. Therefore, the motion is denied.

Accordingly,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to File Documents Under Seal (Docket No. 8) shall be, and it is hereby, DENIED.

20070503

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.