Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Williams v. Premier NSN L.L.C
June 18, 2007
ROLAND J. WILLIAMS PLAINTIFF
v.
PREMIER NSN L.L.C, ET AL. DEFENDANTS
The opinion of the court was delivered by: James M. Moody United States District Judge
On May 4, 2007, the Court directed plaintiff to provide the Court with a written statement of whether plaintiff intended to proceed pro se or obtain substitute counsel. Plaintiff was directed to provide the Court with this information by May 24, 2007. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's Order.
On June 4, 2007, the Court directed plaintiff to respond to defendants' pending Motion to Dismiss on, or before June 14, 2007. Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's Order.
Plaintiff is directed to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) of the United States District Courts for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas which states that pro se litigants are required to monitor the progress of their case, to prosecute or defend the action diligently, and to respond to any communication from the Court within thirty (30) days or their case could be dismissed without prejudice.
The plaintiff is given until July 5, 2007 to show cause why his case should not be dismissed without prejudice*fn1 for failure to respond to the Court's Orders and for failure to defend his case by responding to defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18 day of ...