Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Southwestern Bell Telephone
October 9, 2007
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION PLAINTIFF
v.
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE, L.P. D/B/A AT&T SOUTHWEST AND SBC COMMUNICATIONS DEFENDANT
The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Leon Holmes United States District Judge
The EEOC has moved in limine to prevent introduction of certain evidence regarding Glenn Owen on the ground that it is irrelevant and unfairly prejudicial. AT&T has responded that it will not mention that evidence without first approaching the bench to give the Court the opportunity to determine whether the testimony is relevant for purposes of cross-examination. Therefore, without objection, the motion in limine is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Before AT&T mentions the evidence that is the subject of the motion in limine, counsel must approach the bench to give the Court the opportunity to determine whether that testimony is relevant for purposes of cross-examination.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of October, 2007.
© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...