Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation

November 16, 2007

IN RE: PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
DONNA SCROGGIN PLAINTIFF
v.
WYETH, ET. AL. DEFENDANTS



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Wm. R. Wilson, Jr. United States District Judge

MDL Docket No. 4:03CV1507-WRW

ORDER

Defendant's Motion to Compel re First Set of Case-Specific Interrogatories (Doc. No. 62) is DENIED.

Defendant's Motion for Protective Order Re Plaintiffs' Discovery Requests Re 2927 (Doc. No. 128) is DENIED without prejudice. However, Plaintiff's discovery requests appear to be a bit broad.

Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to Requests for Admissions (Doc. No. 249) is DENIED without prejudice. By the time mentioned in the November 15, 2007 hearing (I think I mentioned one), Plaintiff's counsel must either admit or deny each of Defendant's requests, without explanation.

If a request is denied, the denial cannot be referred to during the trial.

If the denial is one which plainly ought in fairness be admitted, Defendant can file a motion for sanctions after the trial.

My general feeling about requests for admission is that they should be directed to specific facts, not law or opinions, or a mixture thereof.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of November, 2007.

20071116

© 1992-2007 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.