Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Murphy v. Ledbetter

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Hot Springs Division

September 8, 2014

LISA MURPHY, Plaintiff,
v.
SHERIFF CHAD LEDBETTER; GEORGE WRIGHT; CORP. LINDA ROWE; SGT. LINGO; AMY MARTIN; and BRIAN OREL, Defendants.

ORDER

SUSAN O. HICKEY, District Judge.

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed July 29, 2014, by the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 59. Judge Marschewski recommends that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 48) be granted. Plaintiff has responded with objections, and the Court has reviewed the objections. ECF Nos. 62 and 63. The Court, being well and sufficiently advised, finds that Plaintiff's objections offer neither law nor fact requiring departure from the Report and Recommendation.[1] After reviewing the record de novo, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in toto.

Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 48) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's official capacity claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's claims regarding conditions of confinement, equal protection, and privacy are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's claims relating to the alleged sexual assault and harassment are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. ยง 1997e(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.