Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Bradford

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II

October 8, 2014

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE APPELLANT
v.
RAY BRADFORD ET AL. APPELLEES

APPEAL FROM THE INDEPENDENCE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. CV-2011-38-4] HONORABLE TIM WEAVER, JUDGE

Laser Law Firm, by: Brian A. Brown, for appellant.

Blair & Stroud, by: H. David Blair, for appellees.

JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge

This is an appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of a declaratory-judgment claim. We dismiss the appeal for lack of a final order.

Appellee Ray Bradford had a business that maintained parking lots. He purchased an articulated boom lift to use in his business. Ray and his brother, Jason, were using the lift to install a security camera in a storage building near Ray's residence that contained both personal and business property. The boom tipped over and injured Jason, and a claim was made under Ray's homeowner's insurance policy issued by appellant Farmers Insurance Exchange. Appellant filed a complaint for declaratory judgment, asserting that Jason's injury was excluded from coverage because it occurred in connection with a business operated by the insured, and because the articulated boom came within the policy exclusion regarding injuries sustained in the operation or use of motor vehicles. Ray answered, denying that either the business or motor-vehicle exclusions were applicable. Jason also answered, denying that the exclusions were applicable, and filed a counterclaim, alleging that he was injured as a result of Ray's negligent operation of the boom and seeking judgment against the appellant insurer. After a hearing, the trial court entered an order finding that neither the business exclusion nor the motor-vehicle exclusion was applicable and dismissing appellant's declaratory-judgment action with prejudice. The order did not dispose of Jason's counterclaim. This appeal followed.

We cannot reach the merits because the order appealed from is not final. Because the question of whether an order is final and appealable goes to the jurisdiction of the appellate court, it is an issue that we are obliged to determine on our own motion. Stephens v. Bredemeyer, 2011 Ark.App. 727. Rule 2(a)(1) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure–Civil provides that an appeal may be taken from a final judgment or decree from the trial court. If a lawsuit has more than one claim for relief or more than one party, an order or judgment adjudicating fewer than all claims and all parties is neither final nor appealable. Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b)(2). When the order appealed from is not final, we have no jurisdiction to decide the merits. McDougal v. Sabine River Land Co., 2014 Ark.App. 210.

Here, the counterclaim filed by Jason Bradford against appellant was not disposed of by the order. While a trial court may certify an otherwise nonfinal order for an immediate appeal by executing a certificate pursuant to Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b)(1), no such certification was obtained in this case. A declaratory-judgment order is not final unless all third-party claims are resolved or a proper Rule 54(b) certification is obtained. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. v. Williams, 2011 Ark.App. 232.

Appeal dismissed.

Walmsley and Hixson, JJ., agree.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.