United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division
October 24, 2014
JUSTIN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff,
WEYERHAEUSER WOOD COMPANY, et al, Defendants.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge.
On September 30, 2014, Plaintiff filed a pro se Complaint against Defendants. ECF No. 1. This Complaint alleged wrongful termination by his former employer, Defendant Weyerhaeuser Wood Compnay. Id. On September 30, 2014, an Order was entered directing Plaintiff to complete an in forma pauperis ("IFP") application or pay the $350.00 filing fee, plus $50.00 administrative fee by October 14, 2014. ECF No. 2. Plaintiff was informed that failure to do so would subject the Complaint to dismissal. Id. Plaintiff also failed to sign his Complaint. He was sent a copy of his Complaint and was ordered to return the signed Complaint by October 14, 2014. Id. Plaintiff has failed to respond and not has not completed the IFP application or paid the filing fee, and has not returned the signed Complaint.
Based upon Plaintiff's failure to comply with a court order, this Court recommends that Plaintiff's case be DISMISSED.
The parties have fourteen (14) days from receipt of this Report and Recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The parties are reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court. See Thompson v. Nix, 897 F.2d 356, 357 (8th Cir. 1990).