United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division
January 13, 2015
DEBORAH JEAN BRIDGES, PLAINTIFF
SHERIFF TIM HELDER; SGT. MORSE; DEPUTY MULVANEY; CORPORAL JONES; DEPUTY ROBBINS; DEPUTY SANDERS; DEPUTY WALLACE; DEPUTY JENNINGS; MS. JUDY, Head of Female Ministers; and PASTOR BRATTEN, DEFENDANTS
Deborah Jean Bridges, Plaintiff, Pro se, Little Rock, AR.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
HON. ERIN L. SETSER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
This is a civil rights action filed by the Plaintiff pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis .
By order (Doc. 14) entered on September 17, 2014, the Plaintiff was directed to file an addendum to the Complaint by October 10, 2014. Plaintiff was advised that failure to respond to the Court order could result in the dismissal of her case.
To date, Plaintiff has not filed the addendum. She has not requested an extension of time to do so. Plaintiff has not communicated with the Court in anyway. No mail has been returned as undeliverable.
I therefore recommend that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice based on the Plaintiff's failure to obey an order of the Court and to prosecute her case. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).
The Plaintiff has fourteen (14) days from receipt of the report and recommendation in which to file written objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact. The Plaintiff is reminded that objections must be both timely and specific to trigger de novo review by the district court.