United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division
January 14, 2015
LESTER YOUNG REG. #XXXXX-XXX, Plaintiff,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INSTRUCTIONS
JEROME T. KEARNEY, Magistrate Judge.
The following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the findings and recommendations. The copy will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact.
If you are objecting to the recommendation and also desire to submit new, different, or additional evidence, and to have a hearing for this purpose before the District Judge, you must, at the same time that you file your written objections, include the following:
1. Why the record made before the Magistrate Judge is inadequate.
2. Why the evidence proffered at the hearing before the District Judge (if such a hearing is granted) was not offered at the hearing before the Magistrate Judge.
3. The detail of any testimony desired to be introduced at the hearing before the District Judge in the form of an offer of proof, and a copy, or the original, of any documentary or other non-testimonial evidence desired to be introduced at the hearing before the District Judge.
From this submission, the District Judge will determine the necessity for an additional evidentiary hearing, either before the Magistrate Judge or before the District Judge.
Mail your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to:
Plaintiff Young is a federal inmate at the Forrest City Low Federal Correctional Institution, who filed this pro se Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) action on August 19, 2014 (Doc. No. 2).
On December 8, 2014, mail sent to Plaintiff at his last-known address was returned to the Court as Undeliverable (Doc. No. 8). Therefore, on December 10, 2014, the Court directed Plaintiff to provide notification of his current address and his intent to continue prosecution with this action within thirty days, and that failure to respond could result in the dismissal of his Complaint (Doc. No. 9). The copy of the Order sent to Plaintiff was returned to the Court as undeliverable on December 23, 2014 (Doc. No. 11), and Plaintiff has not otherwise corresponded with the Court. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's Complaint against Defendant be DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.