United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
JAMES M. MOODY, Jr., District Judge.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. After carefully considering the Plaintiff's amended complaint and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
To prove actual injury, [a prisoner] must demonstrate that a nonfrivolous legal claim had been frustrated or was being impeded.'" White v. Kautzky, 494 F.3d 677, 680 (8th Cir.2007) (quoting Lewis v. Casey , 518 U.S. 343, 353, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996)). Plaintiff claims that he was convicted of charges listed in his parole violation report because he had no law library access. (ECF No. 6). This allegation is speculative at best. Plaintiff does not demonstrate that he had a nonfrivolous legal claim to present. Therefore, the Court finds that Plaintiff's attempt to amend his complaint is futile.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
2. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order ...