Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas

May 19, 2016

CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., Defendants.

          ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP JASON A. FORGE DEBRA J. WYMAN LAURA M. ANDRACCHIO AUSTIN P. BRANE MICHAEL ALBERT, AUSTIN P. BRANE, Lead Counsel for Plaintiff

          PATTON TIDWELL & CULBERTSON, LLP, NICHOLAS H. PATTON, GEOFFREY P. CULBERTSON, Liaison Counsel

          BARRETT JOHNSTON MARTIN & GARRISON, LLC DOUGLAS S. JOHNSTON, JR. TIMOTHY L. MILES, Additional Counsel for Plaintiff

          JESS ASKEW III (Ark. Bar No. 86005) TERESA WASTELAND (Ark. Bar No. 81168) KUTAK ROCK LLP, JESS ASKEW III

          PETER A. WALD BRIAN T. GLENNON COLLEEN C. SMITH SARAH A. GREENFIELD NICHOLAS J. SICJLIANO ANDREW R. GRAY MARCY C. PRIEDEMAN LATHAM AND WATKINS LLP, Attorneys for Defendants Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Michael T. Duke

          STIPULATED ORDER ESTABLISHING PROTOCOL FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

          HONORABLE SUSAN O. HICKEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         I. SCOPE

         A. The general procedures and protocols outlined herein govern the search for, review and production of documents, including ESI (as defined below), by a party during the pendency of this litigation.

         B. As used in this order, the terms "ESI" or "Electronically Stored Information" mean "[a]s referenced in the United States Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, information that is stored electronically, regardless of the media or whether it is in the original format in which it was created, as opposed to stored in hard copy." The Sedona Conference Glossary.

         II. IDENTIFICATION OF RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS

         Documents and ESI which are neither privileged nor otherwise protected shall be timely reviewed and produced in accordance with this Order. After receiving requests for production of documents, the party making the production (the "Producing Party") shall conduct a reasonable and good faith search for responsive documents.

         A. Preservation

         Consistent with the parties' obligations under Rule 26(f)(2) and the parties' Joint Report pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f) and Local Rule 26.1 (Dkt. No. 171), both parties have taken reasonable measures to preserve potentially discoverable data from alteration or destruction in the ordinary course of business or otherwise.

         B. ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.