United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
Derrick Renard Johnson, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
T. KEARNEY, Magistrate Judge.
following recommended disposition has been sent to United
States District Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. Any party may serve
and file written objections to this recommendation.
Objections should be specific and should include the factual
or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a
factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the
evidence that supports your objection. An original and one
copy of your objections must be received in the office of the
United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen
(14) days from the date of the findings and recommendations.
The copy will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to
file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to
appeal questions of fact.
are objecting to the recommendation and also desire to submit
new, different, or additional evidence, and to have a hearing
for this purpose before the District Judge, you must, at the
same time that you file your written objections, include the
the record made before the Magistrate Judge is inadequate.
the evidence proffered at the hearing before the District
Judge (if such a hearing is granted) was not offered at the
hearing before the Magistrate Judge.
detail of any testimony desired to be introduced at the
hearing before the District Judge in the form of an offer of
proof, and a copy, or the original, of any documentary or
other non-testimonial evidence desired to be introduced at
the hearing before the District Judge.
this submission, the District Judge will determine the
necessity for an additional evidentiary hearing, either
before the Magistrate Judge or before the District Judge.
your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to:
Derrick Johnson is an inmate confined at the Craighead County
Detention Facility (Jail). He filed this pro se 42 U.S.C. Â§
1983 action against Defendants, alleging improper conditions
of confinement and denial of adequate medical care while
incarcerated at the Jail. By Order dated May 11, 2016 (Doc.
No. 4), this Court granted Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed
in forma pauperis in this lawsuit. However, finding
Plaintiff's complaint too vague and conclusory to enable
the Court to determine whether it was frivolous, malicious,
or failed to state a claim, the Court provided Plaintiff the
opportunity to amend his complaint within thirty days. (
Id., p. 4) As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed
an Amended Complaint.
reviewed Plaintiff's Complaint, the Court finds it should
be dismissed, for failure to state a ...