Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ruth v. McGee

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

July 11, 2016

ERWIN RUTH ADC #135534, Plaintiff,
v.
STAN McGEE, Sheriff Dallas County Sheriff's Office; et al., Defendants.

          Erwin Ruth, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

          Stan McGee, Defendant, represented by John R. Myers, Attorney at Law & C. Burt Newell, C. Burt Newell, Attorney at Law.

          Brian Shaddock, Defendant, represented by John R. Myers, Attorney at Law.

          Brian Shaddock, Defendant, represented by C. Burt Newell, C. Burt Newell, Attorney at Law.

          Loren Williams, Defendant, represented by John R. Myers, Attorney at Law & C. Burt Newell, C. Burt Newell, Attorney at Law.

          Mike Griffin, Defendant, represented by John R. Myers, Attorney at Law.

          Mike Griffin, Defendant, represented by C. Burt Newell, C. Burt Newell, Attorney at Law.

          PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INSTRUCTIONS

          JOE J. VOLPE, Magistrate Judge.

         The following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District Judge J. Leon Holmes. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen days from the date of the findings and recommendations. The copy will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact.

         If you are objecting to the recommendation and also desire to submit new, different, or additional evidence, and to have a hearing for this purpose before either the District Judge or Magistrate Judge, you must, at the time you file your written objections, include the following:

         1. Why the record made before the Magistrate Judge is inadequate.

         2. Why the evidence to be proffered at the new hearing (if such a hearing is granted) was not offered at the hearing before the Magistrate Judge.

         3. The details of any testimony desired to be introduced at the new hearing in the form of an offer of proof, and a copy, or the original, of any documentary or other non-testimonial evidence desired to be introduced at the new hearing.

         From this submission, the District Judge will determine the necessity for an additional evidentiary hearing. Mail your ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.