Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wright v. Warner

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Eastern Division

July 12, 2016

JOHN KIRBY WRIGHT, ADC #99769, Plaintiff,
v.
MIKE WARNER, et al., Defendants.

          John Kirby Wright, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

          PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS INSTRUCTIONS

          JEROME T. KEARNEY, Magistrate Judge.

         The following recommended disposition has been sent to United States District Judge J. Leon Holmes. Any party may serve and file written objections to this recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the evidence that supports your objection. An original and one copy of your objections must be received in the office of the United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of the findings and recommendations. The copy will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to file timely objections may result in a waiver of the right to appeal questions of fact.

         If you are objecting to the recommendation and also desire to submit new, different, or additional evidence, and to have a hearing for this purpose before the District Judge, you must, at the same time that you file your written objections, include the following:

         1. Why the record made before the Magistrate Judge is inadequate.

         2. Why the evidence proffered at the hearing (if such a hearing is granted) was not offered at the hearing before the Magistrate Judge.

         3. The detail of any testimony desired to be introduced at the new hearing in the form of an offer of proof, and a copy, or the original, of any documentary or other non-testimonial evidence desired to be introduced at the new hearing.

         From this submission, the District Judge will determine the necessity for an additional evidentiary hearing.

         Mail your objections and "Statement of Necessity" to:

         DISPOSITION

         I. INTRODUCTION

         Plaintiff John Kirby Wright, a state inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and a Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. Nos. 1, 3). Although Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by § 1915(a), his Motions should be denied. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

         II. SCREENING

         The Court is required to screen complaints seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. §1915(a). Additionally, the Prison ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.