United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fayetteville Division
WAL-MART STORES, INC. PLAINTIFF/ COUNTER-DEFENDANT
CUKER INTERACTIVE, LLC DEFENDANT/ COUNTER-CLAIMANT
ORDER ON JURY VERDICT
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10th day of April, 2017, this matter came before the Court
for trial to a duly qualified and selected jury consisting of
nine (9) members. On April 20, 2017, after nine days of
trial, the parties rested. The jury was instructed on
applicable law, closing arguments were presented, and the
case was submitted on interrogatories. The jury recessed over
the evening hours and returned on April 21, 2017, to continue
deliberating its verdict. Thereafter, the jury appeared in
open court and delivered the following unanimous
Walmart's Breach of Contract Claim Against Cuker
NO. 1-A: Do you find, by the greater weight of the
evidence, that Cuker breached its contract with Walmart?
Cuker's Breach of Contract Claim Against Walmart
NO. 2-A: Do you find, by the greater weight of the
evidence, that Walmart breached its contract with Cuker?
NO. 2-B: What amount do you find, by the greater weight
of the evidence, reasonably and fairly compensates Cuker for
Walmart's breach of contract?
Cuker's Unjust Enrichment Claim Against Walmart
NO. 3-A: Do you find, by the greater weight of the
evidence, that Walmart was unjustly enriched to Cuker's
NO. 3-B: What amountdo you find, bythegreaterweightofthe
evidence, is the reasonable value of Cuker's services
unjustly received by Walmart?
NO. 3-C: Do you find, by the greater weight of the
evidence, that Walmart intentionally demanded the services it
unjustly received, with the knowledge or belief that those
services were ...