Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. May

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division

June 21, 2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
JEREMY PAUL MAY

          AMENDED PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE

          HONORABLE SUSAN O. HICKEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         On August 28, 2017, a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture was filed. (Doc. 47).

         In the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, the first paragraph states:

         "On June 22, 2016, A Grand Jury sitting in the Western District of Arkansas returned a Superseding Indictment against the Defendant, Jeremy Paul Yates, charging him with four counts of distribution of methamphetamine, one count of conspiracy to distribute or manufacture methamphetamine, and one count of having been previously convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year, knowingly possessing a firearm, in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), and a forfeiture allegation."

         The first paragraph of the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture should have stated:

         On June 22, 2016, A Grand Jury sitting in the Western District of Arkansas returned a Superseding Indictment against the Defendant, Jeremy Paul May, charging him with one count of conspiracy to distribute or manufacture methamphetamine in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), all in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 846; one count of distribute of methamphetamine to a person under twenty-one years of age, in violation of Title 841(a)(1) and 859(a); four counts of distribution of methamphetamine in violation of Title 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); and one count of having been previously convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year, knowingly possessing a firearm, in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2), and a forfeiture allegation."

         In the forfeiture allegation of the Superseding Indictment, the United States seeks forfeiture, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(d) and 3665, of

         1. A Derringer, F.I.E. Model D38 with double barrel, .38 Special serial number 0007099;and

         2. Any ammunition involved in Count 9, as property involved in, or used to facilitate the offense.

         The description of the firearm has an incorrect serial number. The correction description of the firearm arm is "A Derringer, F.I.E. Model D38 with double barrel, .38 Special serial number 0007009".

         On August 28, 2017, the Defendant pleaded guilty to the Superseding Indictment. Pursuant to a Plea Agreement entered into by the parties, the Defendant agrees to forfeit all rights, title and interest to a Derringer, F.I.E. Model D38 with double barrel, .38 Special serial number 0007099 and any ammunition involved in Count 9 listed in the Superseding Indictment. The Defendant acknowledges that all property covered by the Plea Agreement is subject to forfeiture as property facilitating illegal conduct, or property involved in illegal conduct giving rise to forfeiture, or as substitute assets for property otherwise subject to forfeiture.

         Pursuant to the Plea Agreement, the Defendant consents to the immediate entry of a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture upon entry of the guilty plea. The Defendant further agrees that upon entry of the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture, such Order will be considered final as to Defendant's interests in the property(ies). The Defendant agrees to immediately withdraw any claims to property(ies) seized in connection with this case in any pending administrative and civil forfeiture proceeding, and consents to the forfeiture of all properties seized in connection with this case to the United States. The Defendant agrees to execute any and all documents requested by the Government to facilitate or complete the forfeiture process(es.) The Defendant further agrees not to contest or to assist any other person or entity in contesting the forfeiture of the property(ies) seized in connection with this case.

         Pursuant to the Plea Agreement, the Defendant agrees to consent to the entry of Orders of forfeiture for such property and waives the requirements of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 32.2 and 43(a) regarding notice of the forfeiture in the charging instrument, announcement of the forfeiture at sentencing, and incorporation of the forfeiture in the judgment. The Defendant acknowledges that he understands that the forfeiture of assets is part of the sentence that may be imposed in this case and waives any failure by the court to advise him of this, pursuant to Rule 1 l(b)(1)(J), at the time his guilty plea is accepted.

         Pursuant to the Plea Agreement, the Defendant further agrees to waive all constitutional and statutory challenges in any manner (including direct appeal, habeas corpus, or any other means) to any forfeiture carried out in accordance with the Plea Agreement on any grounds, including that the forfeiture constitutes an excessive fine or punishment. The Defendant agrees to take all steps as requested by the United States to pass clear title to forfeitable assets to the United States, and to testify truthfully in any judicial forfeiture proceeding. The Defendant also agrees that the forfeiture provisions ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.