United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
VOLPE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
following recommended disposition has been sent to United
States District Judge Brian S. Miller. Any party may serve
and file written objections to this recommendation.
Objections should be specific and should include the factual
or legal basis for the objection. If the objection is to a
factual finding, specifically identify that finding and the
evidence that supports your objection. An original and one
copy of your objections must be received in the office of the
United States District Court Clerk no later than fourteen
(14) days from the date of the findings and recommendations.
The copy will be furnished to the opposing party. Failure to
file timely objections may result in waiver of the right to
appeal questions of fact.
are objecting to the recommendation and also desire to submit
new, different, or additional evidence, and to have a hearing
for this purpose before the District Judge, you must, at the
same time that you file your written objections, include the
1. Why the record made before the Magistrate Judge is
2. Why the evidence proffered at the hearing (if such a
hearing is granted) was not offered at the hearing before the
3. The details of any testimony desired to be introduced at
the new hearing in the form of an offer of proof, and a copy,
or the original, of any documentary or other non-testimonial
evidence desired to be introduced at the new hearing.
this submission, the District Judge will determine the
necessity for an additional evidentiary hearing. Mail your
objections and “Statement of Necessity” to:
Clerk, United States District Court Eastern District of
Arkansas 600 West Capitol Avenue, Suite A149 Little Rock, AR
Friar (“Plaintiff”) is incarcerated at the
Craighead County Detention Center and filed this action
pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No.
1.) She sued the Craighead County Detention Center
(“Detention Center”) and multiple Detention
Center employees. (Doc. Nos. 1, 4.) She makes excessive force
and conditions of confinement claims, among others. (Doc.
Nos. I, 4.) Plaintiff seeks damages and “justice for
all amputees, ” as well as other relief. (Doc. No. 4,
at 6.) After careful review of Plaintiff's Complaint, as
amended (Doc. Nos. 1, 4) (“Complaint”), I find it
should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted.
Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”) requires
federal courts to screen prisoner complaints seeking relief
against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or
portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that (a)
are legally frivolous or malicious; (b) fail to state a claim
upon which relief may be ...