Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Koppers, Inc. v. Trotter

Supreme Court of Arkansas

May 2, 2019

KOPPERS, INC., Appellant
v.
Kelvin TROTTER, Nathane Davis, Lonzo Allen, and Ken Piggee, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellees

Page 373

          APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 60CV-16-3025], HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER CHARLES PIAZZA, JUDGE

         Quattlebaum, Grooms & Tull PLLC, Little Rock, by: E.B. Chiles IV, Joseph R. Falasco, and Sarah E. DeLoach, for appellant.

         Holleman & Associates, P.A., by: John Holleman, Timothy A. Steadman, Jerry Garner, Little Rock, for appellees.

         OPINION

         JOHN DAN KEMP, Chief Justice

          Koppers, Inc., appeals the Pulaski County Circuit Court’s order certifying a

Page 374

class action lawsuit filed by Koppers employees Kelvin Trotter, Nathane Davis, Lonzo Allen, and Ken Piggee, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (collectively referred to as employees). Koppers contends that the circuit court failed to provide any reasoning supporting class certification, precluding meaningful review and requiring reversal. Alternatively, Koppers contends that employees did not meet their burden of proving the requirements for class certification. We remand the case with instructions to enter an order that complies with Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 23 (2018).

          I. Facts

         Koppers operates a crosstie-treatment plant in North Little Rock, Arkansas. While working at the plant, employees must wear protective clothing and equipment provided by Koppers. Employees start each workday by clocking in at one of two bathhouses, taking off their street clothes, putting on ("donning") specified uniforms and personal protective equipment, and walking to their workstations. At the end of the shift, employees walk back to the bathhouses, remove ("doff") their uniforms and protective equipment, change back into their street clothes, and clock out.[1]

         Employees filed suit against Koppers pursuant to the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act (AMWA), Ark. Code Ann. � � 11-4-201 et seq. for unpaid overtime. They claimed that Koppers violated the AMWA by failing to compensate them for time spent donning and doffing their uniforms and protective equipment and walking to and from their workstations. After filing their complaint, employees moved to certify a class of

[a]ll individuals who were, are, or will be employed by Defendant as hourly paid employees at the Koppers plant in North Little Rock, Arkansas, at any time within the three years prior to the filing of this Complaint through the date of the final disposition of this action, and who were, are, or will be required to perform donning and doffing activities.

          Koppers removed the case to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction. After the case was removed, employees amended their complaint to add the current manager and a former manager of the North Little Rock plant as defendants. The addition of these defendants destroyed diversity, and the case was remanded to the circuit court.

          After remand, Koppers answered and denied that employees were entitled to compensation for unpaid overtime. Koppers asserted that for each shift they worked, employees were paid for five minutes of time for putting on their uniforms and personal protective equipment, five minutes of time for walking to their workstations, and ten minutes of time for walking from their workstations to the bathhouses and changing out of their uniforms and ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.