Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Tullos v. Biomet, Inc.

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Western Division

May 9, 2019

DOYLE E. TULLOS PLAINTIFF
v.
BIOMET, INC., et al. DEFENDANTS JOHNNY LUCAS PLAINTIFF
v.
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS LLC, et al. DEFENDANTS GARY SANDEN and SUSAN SANDEN PLAINTIFFS
v.
BIOMET, INC., et al. DEFENDANTS DILLARD SHERRILL and PATRECA M. SHERRILL PLAINTIFFS
v.
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS LLC, et al. DEFENDANTS VALENA HONEYCUTT PLAINTIFF
v.
JOHN CUCKLER, M.D., et al. DEFENDANTS

          ORDER

          D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

         By agreement of the parties, the Protective Order entered in the MDL, Exhibit C to No. 242 in No. 3:12-md-2391, which is attached to this Order, is entered -as amended -in all these cases. The amendments: (1) disputes must be handled pursuant to this Court's procedure, which will be in the Final Scheduling Order; (2) if practicable, parties must redact confidential information and file papers on the public docket rather than under seal, Fed.R.Civ.P. 5.2; (3) the Protective Order shall remain in effect for one year after the end of all litigation in these five cases, including any appeal; thereafter, the obligations in this Protective Order shall continue but shall be solely a matter of contract among the parties, their lawyers, and signatories; and (4) the "and/or" in paragraph 6(g) is corrected to "or''

         So Ordered.

         EXHIBIT C

         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

         IN RE: BIOMET M2a MAGNUM HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (MDL 2391)

         This Document Relates to All Cases

         No. 3:12-md-2391

          Robert L. Miller, Jr. Judge

         STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER OF CONFIDENTIALITY

         It appearing that certain information, documents, and things of the parties subject to discovery in the above-captioned action is likely to involve the disclosure of confidential information, including by way of example and not limitation, financial, marketing, technical, licensing, research and development and other commercial information (hereinafter referred to as "Confidential Information"), that the parties reasonably believe to comprise sensitive and valuable information whose disclosure could cause a party competitive harm:

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the attorneys for the parties, and approved by the court, that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1) and Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d):

         1. This Stipulation and Protective Order shall apply to all information, documents, and things subject to discovery in this action, including, without limitation, testimony adduced at depositions upon oral examination or upon written questions pursuant to Rules 30 and 31, information and documents produced in response to Fact Sheets, answers to Interrogatories pursuant to Rule 33, documents produced pursuant to Rule 34, information obtained from inspection of premises or things pursuant to Rule 34, and answers to requests for admission pursuant to Rule 36. This Protective Order supersedes all prior orders entered in actions in MDL No. 2391 prior to their transfer to the MDL and governs discovery that has already been produced and discovery to be produced in the future.

         2. Any party to this litigation and any third-party shall have the right to designate as Confidential Information subject to this Order any information, document, or thing, or portion of any document or thing that contains: (a) trade secrets, competitively sensitive technical, marketing, licensing, research and development, financial, sales or other proprietary or confidential business information; (b) private or confidential personal information; (c) information received in confidence from third parties; or (d) information that the producing party otherwise believes in good faith to be entitled to protection under Rule 26(c)(1)(G) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any party to this litigation or any third-party covered by this Order, who produces or discloses any Confidential Information, including, without limitation, any information, document, thing, interrogatory ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.