Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Eason v. Wagner Spray Tech Corp.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas

June 12, 2019

CARNEAL EASON PLAINTIFF
v.
WAGNER SPRAY TECH CORPORATION d/b/a TITAN TOOL, INC.; and SHERWIN-WILLIAMS DEFENDANT

          PLAINTIFFS: David A. Hodges (65021) Attorney at Law and Louis A. Etoch (89030) Attorney at Law

          DEFENDANTS: Michael D. Barnes (88071) WRIGHT, LINDSEY & JENNINGS LLP and George W. Soule, pro hac vice SOULE & STULL LLC Attorneys for Defendant Wagner Spray Tech Corporation

          Thomas G. Williams (88186) Quattlebaum, Grooms & Tull PLLC Attorneys for Sherwin Williams

          AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER

         The parties to this case, through their respective counsel, agree that pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, they will protect the confidentiality of certain information (including deposition testimony) and documents (including documents stored in any electronic format). The parties agree that the confidentiality of this information and these documents shall be preserved under the terms of this Protective Order.

         1. It is agreed that material requested by or of any of the parties, and any non-parties from which discovery may be sought, which they deem confidential, shall be disclosed only to the following individuals, each of whom shall be required to read this Protective Order and agree to abide by its terms before being given any of the information:

a. Counsel for plaintiff and counsel for defendant who are actively engaged in the conduct of this litigation and their staff to the extent reasonably necessary to render professional services in the litigation;
b. The parties to the litigation and their experts;
c. Witnesses providing sworn deposition testimony;
d. The Court and its staff; and
e. Any other individuals included by order of the Court.

         Documents produced by the parties to which this Protective Order is applicable shall be stamped "CONFIDENTIAL" by the party desiring the document to be designated confidential.

         2. The inadvertent production, without designation as confidential, of information or a document intended to be designated or that should have been designated as being confidential shall not waive the right to so designate such document or information. Any information or documentation that is inadvertently not designated as being confidential when produced shall be, upon written request of the producing party, thereafter treated as being designated as confidential under this Protective Order.

         3. A party or non-party may designate as "CONFIDENTIAL" portions of any deposition transcript wherein confidential information or materials designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" are identified, discussed, or disclosed. Portions of a deposition transcript so designated will be subject to the terms of this Protective Order. The designation must be made by letter sent by facsimile or electronic mail to opposing counsel within twenty-one business days after receipt of the transcript. Any confidentiality designation asserted on the record during a deposition must be confirmed in writing within this same time period, providing the specific pages of the transcript that are designated as "CONFIDENTIAL." The portions of a deposition transcript that mention or discuss materials designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" must be treated as "CONFIDENTIAL" and therefore subject to this Protective Order until 5:00 p.m. Central Time on the twenty-first (business day after receipt of the transcript. All portions of the deposition transcript not designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" by 5:00 p.m. Central Time on the twenty-first business day after receipt of the transcript are excluded from the protections of this Protective Order.

         4. Designation of documents or information as Confidential Information shall not be effective as to information obtained from the public domain or from sources (other than the Producing Party) who were rightfully in possession of the information and authorized to disclose it, regardless of whether such ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.