In the MATTER OF the GUARDIANSHIP OF Betty BEVILL Jonathan R. Streit, Appellant
v.
State of Arkansas, Appellee
Rehearing Denied August 1, 2019
Page 28
APPEAL
FROM THE WHITE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 73PR-18-90],
HONORABLE THOMAS M. HUGHES, JUDGE
Lightle, Raney, Streit & Streit, LLP, by: Jonathan R. Streit,
for appellant.
Leslie
Rutledge, Atty Gen., by: Jacob H. Jones, Asst Atty Gen.,
for appellee.
OPINION
RHONDA
K. WOOD, Associate Justice
Attorney Jonathan Streit appeals the circuit courts contempt
finding and $ 100 fine. Streit argues that the evidence was
insufficient to support a finding of contempt. We
affirm.[1]
In May
2018, Streit appeared before the circuit court on a petition
for permanent guardianship over the person and estate of
Betty Bevill. Evidently in the months preceding the hearing,
Streit was involved in a separate, unrelated appeal involving
the same circuit court. See In re Estate of
Edens, 2018 Ark.App. 226, 548 S.W.3d 179. In Estate
of Edens, Streit represented the client of another
attorney, Simpson, on an appeal of a denial of a recusal
motion. In that case, Simpson had argued that the circuit
court was biased against him and should recuse from all cases
in which Simpson was associated. The circuit court denied the
motion to recuse. Streit filed the appeal for Simpsons
client, and the court of appeals reversed. Id. The
mandate in Estate of Edens issued in April 2018, and
approximately one month later, Streit appeared before the
same circuit court in this case.
Streit
argues that because he appealed and successfully reversed the
circuit court in Estate of Edens, that the circuit
court took issue with him at the guardianship hearing in the
instant matter. Streit alleges that at the hearing, the
circuit court
Page 29
immediately noted several deficiencies in the case file,
including the lack of necessary professional medical
evidence. The circuit court was unwilling to allow the matter
to proceed without compliance with the statutory
requirements. At that point the following exchange occurred.
MR. STREIT: So just to be clear, if there is an individual
who recognizes and has been diagnosed with dementia and
wishes for a guardianship to be placed over her by her
daughter -
THE COURT: Sir, you dont need to be clear. I told you the
answer.
MR. STREIT: Judge - I understand that, Judge. Im going to
make my record.
THE COURT: Why dont you -
MR. STREIT: Im going to make my record.
THE COURT: I tell you what. Why dont you go get the book and
you can read ...