United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division
GLICENIA C. LOGAN PLAINTIFF
SGT. CHRIS WATERS (Arkansas State Police); SHELLPOINT/CONTRYWIDE/BANK OF AMERICA (Trustee/Home Loan Serv/Banking and Loans); SENIOR CORPORAL MICHAEL SPRINGER (Supervisor/Investigating Officer); JOYCE BRADLEY BABIN/NATASHA GRAF (Chapter 13 Standing/Case Worker Trustee); CHIEF JUDGE BEN T. BARRY (United States Bankruptcy Court); JOHN MICHAEL RAINWATER/BRIAN LIGHT (Lawyers/Attorney); ALLISON HOUSTON (State Prosecutor's Office/Fort Smith Prosecutor's Office); JUDGE FITZHUGH (Judge District Court of Greenwood); NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE; MR. COOPER MORTHAGE (Mr. Cooper Mortgage Company); DANA BYRUM (District IV manager for Stat[e] of Arkansas); NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORP.; FARM CREDIT SERVICES OF WESTERN ARKANSAS (Andrea Leding Regional Vice President) and LATISHA MEADOWS (DHS Administrative Review Officer) DEFENDANTS
OPINION AND ORDER
HOLMES, III U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
proceeds in this matter pro se. Currently before the
Court are Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by
Defendant Barry (ECF No. 21), Defendants Waters, Springer,
Houston, Fitzhugh, Meadows, and Byrum (“State
Defendants”) (ECF No.'s 25, 63), and Nationstar
Mortgage (“Nationstar”) (ECF No. 44).
filed her Complaint on September 1, 2019. (ECF No. 1). Her
sparse allegations appear to reference the condemnation of an
unidentified parcel of real property. (Id. at 5-6).
The entirety of her claim is as follows:
“I Purchase the property in 2003 with my spouse, in
2004 I Started a Daycare to able to profit and make a
Different, 2005-2006 Started Working on the building on the
road to the daycare, got my daycare Address Register at 4513
Park Road next to my house, I send $500 to Bank of America in
2008 also I Survey the one Acre for the daycare Started my
Garden and Rabbits farm to allowed the kids to eat healthy
and allowed to to learn about the animal, they health, etc I
pay about $75, 000 within 10 years with all my work and
Investment I have spend roughtlyabout $98, 000
Due to lack of accountability of Shellpoint, attorney
Countrywide, Bank of America, Brian Light, the judge and
Court not listening to me know Fema Condemn the house till I
fix it up know I have more than a sick spouse to think about
his health but to put a roof over his head[.]”
(Id. at 5) (errors in original). Plaintiff's
Complaint is silent as to whether she proceeds against
Defendants in their official or individual capacity.
Plaintiff seeks monetary damages in the amount of $250, 000.
(Id. at 6).
Barry filed his Motion to Dismiss on October 15, 2019. (ECF
No. 21). The State Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss
on October 17, 2019. (ECF No. 25). They then filed a Motion
to Correct a scrivener's error on October November 6,
2019. (ECF No. 32). A corrected copy of the Motion was
attached. (ECF No. 32-1). Nationstar filed its Motion to
Dismiss on November 13, 2019. (ECF No. 44).
filed her Response to Defendant Barry and the State
Defendants on October 23, 2019. (ECF No. 28). Plaintiff filed
a Response to the Nationstar motion on November 25, 2019.
(ECF No. 50).
Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) requires only that a complaint
present “a short and plain statement of the claim
showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.”
Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2). “In order to meet this standard,
and survive a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), ‘a
complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as
true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its
face.'” Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,
588 F.3d 585, 594 (8th Cir. 2009) (quoting Ashcroft v.
Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (internal quotations
omitted)). “A claim has facial plausibility when the
plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to
draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable
for the misconduct alleged.” Ashcroft, 556
U.S. at 678. A pro se plaintiff's complaint is liberally
construed, but it must still allege sufficient facts to
support the plaintiff's claims. See Stone v.
Harry, 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004). Merely listing
a defendant in a case caption is insufficient to support a
claim against the defendant. Krych v. Hass, 83
Fed.Appx. 854, 855 (8th Cir. 2003) (citing Potter v.
Clark, 497 F.2d 1206, 1207 (7th Cir. 1974) (per
curiam) (noting that court properly dismissed pro se
complaint that was silent as to defendant except for his name
appearing in caption)).
Barry argues the claims against him should be dismissed
because: (1) he is entitled to absolute judicial immunity as
the Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas; (2) Plaintiff states no factual
allegations against him in her Complaint; and, (3) Plaintiff
failed to perfect service upon him as required by
(ECF No. 21 at 1-2).
State Defendants argue the claims against them should be
dismissed because: (1) Plaintiff failed to perfect service of
process upon them; (2) Plaintiff failed to identify any facts
which would entitle her to relief from the State Defendants;
(3) Judge Fitzhugh is entitled to absolute judicial immunity;
(3) Judge Meadows is entitled to absolute judicial immunity;
(4) Defendant Houston is entitled to prosecutorial immunity;
(5) each State Defendant is entitled to sovereign immunity;
and, (6) Plaintiff's Complaint fails to specifically
allege any ...